AI for business aviation safety and compliance teams
Corporate flight departments, charter operators and complex GA carry the same obligations as an airline with a fraction of the staff.
Sample data. Wexmoor Executive is a fictional operator.
One question, answered from the regulation text.
One person is often the safety manager, the compliance monitor and the training lead. Chuck finds the provisions that decide a question and answers from them, with every passage cited.
Chuck does the reading and cites what it read, which is the part a small team has least time for.
A compliance department you don’t have.
Scope is where a small operator loses the most time, and a wrong answer costs you either way. Part-ORO’s scope reaches non-commercial operations with complex motor-powered aircraft, so the management-system requirements apply to you. The operation type then decides your operating Subpart, and whether the flight-time limitations bind you at all. Chuck works that through against the provision and proposes an answer.
- Part-NCC, Part-NCO and Part-SPO scope worked through against the regulation
- The governing operation type (CAT, NCC, NCO or SPO) established first
- Manual sections and procedures drafted with the requirement cited beside each clause
What flight departments can put in place.
- An occurrence worked through with you, its coding and reportability proposed
- A year of your occurrence reports read as a set, with themes, counts and direction
- Your own manuals read beside the regulations
- Your wording set against a requirement row by row, exported to Excel
- Documents drafted to Word or PDF
- Answers from the regulation text, cited to the provision and, where the source publishes one, the amendment
- A shared project for each audit or investigation, holding its documents and chats
Common questions
Does Chuck know which regulations apply to our kind of operation?
It establishes the operation type first, because the same question has a different answer under Part-CAT, Part-NCC and Part-NCO. It shows the provisions that decide it so you can check the wording, and can set CAT and NCC requirements side by side.
We fly aircraft on more than one register. Can it keep the regulations apart?
Yes. It names the governing framework on every line, and won’t apply an FAA regulation to an EASA operation or the other way round.
We’re a small team. Can it draft our manuals and procedures?
Yes. It drafts operations manual sections, SOPs, a safety policy or a risk assessment on your own matrix, to Word or a branded PDF, with the requirement cited beside the text. Each draft opens with a check-before-use line and a sign-off, and risk ratings are proposed for you to validate.
Can it answer from our own manuals as well as the regulations?
Yes. It reads the manuals you upload beside the regulation, so an answer can show what your manual says next to what the rule requires. Your library is readable only inside your organisation.
Does our data train AI models?
No. Your questions, documents and answers are never used as training data, and that’s written into our contract. Our model provider keeps nothing after each request, and the documents you upload are held on our own UK infrastructure, scoped to your organisation.
Tell us how you operate.
Bring a manual section you think has drifted, or a year of reports nobody has read as a set, and we’ll run it through Chuck in front of you. We’ll tell you straight if we’re not the right people for it.