AI for flight training safety and compliance teams
Chuck answers licensing questions from Part-FCL and reads your training manual against Part-ORA, citing the provision each time.
Sample data. Wexmoor Flight Academy is a fictional training organisation.
A licensing question, answered against Part-FCL.
Licensing questions turn on conditions and dates. Chuck works through the regulation with the instructor’s own records, and cites the provision behind each step.
Get a licensing question wrong and you roster someone you shouldn’t have, or run a course that doesn’t count. Chuck works across Part-FCL, Part-ORA and the ORO.FC training and checking requirements, cross-referenced to the FAA parts.
Privileges, validity and currency.
Ask what a licence or rating permits, what keeps it valid or what has to happen before it lapses, and Chuck answers from Part-FCL. Where crew or aircraft move between jurisdictions, it compares the FAA regulation. It isn’t connected to your crew records, so the check against a named person stays with you.
- Part-FCL ratings, privileges, recency and language proficiency
- Approved Training Organisation requirements under Part-ORA, and course outlines drafted
- Cross-referenced to FAA 14 CFR Parts 61, 141 and 142
What training organisations can put in place.
- An occurrence worked through with you, its coding and reportability proposed
- A year of your occurrence reports read as a set, with themes, counts and direction
- Your own manuals read beside the regulations
- Your wording set against a requirement row by row, exported to Excel
- Documents drafted to Word or PDF
- Answers from the regulation text, cited to the provision and, where the source publishes one, the amendment
- A shared project for each audit or investigation, holding its documents and chats
Common questions
Can Chuck answer licensing questions?
Yes: privileges, validity, revalidation and recency under Part-FCL, each cited to the provision. If you train under both frameworks, it cross-references FAA 14 CFR Parts 61, 141 and 142 and keeps the two apart.
Can it tell us whether an instructor can revalidate?
Give it an export of your instructor records and it works the rule through against them, citing each step, for your head of training to confirm. It only knows what you give it.
Can it draft our course outlines?
Yes. It drafts an ATO course outline in Word, with the Part-ORA and Part-FCL requirements cited beside the content, so an inspector can see the basis for every module.
Can it check our training manual against Part-ORA?
Yes. It sets your manual against the requirement row by row, proposes the gaps for you to check, and drafts any section that needs rewriting.
Does our data train AI models?
No. Your questions, documents and answers are never used as training data, and that’s written into our contract. Our model provider keeps nothing after each request, and the documents you upload are held on our own UK infrastructure, scoped to your organisation.
Tell us how you operate.
Bring a manual section you think has drifted, or a year of reports nobody has read as a set, and we’ll run it through Chuck in front of you. We’ll tell you straight if we’re not the right people for it.