AI for safety and compliance consultancies
Chuck reads each client’s manuals beside the rules they answer to, and drafts the finding, the gap analysis or the manual section for your consultant to check. One firm, many clients, each under its own framework.

Two frameworks, kept apart.
Your clients answer to different authorities. Chuck keeps the frameworks apart and names the governing one on every line, with every passage cited.
Our client is adding an N-registered aircraft to a fleet that is otherwise EASA. For crew currency, what changes? Keep the two frameworks apart — I don't want a blended answer.
Read: Regulation corpus — FAA · Regulation corpus — EASA
Crew currency across two frameworks
FAA and EASA · kept apart
- Under EASA, recent experience sits in Part-FCL and governs whether a pilot may operate in commercial air transport or carry passengers at all. FCL.060
- The operator proficiency check is a separate obligation, completed on its own recurring cycle under the operator's training and checking programme. ORO.FC.230
- Under the FAA, recent flight experience for a pilot in command carrying passengers is set in its own part, on a different structure entirely. 14 CFR § 61.57(a)
Every claim traces to a cited provision. Chuck refuses rather than guessing.
Chuck does the reading and drafting behind each client’s audits, gap analyses and manuals, and shows where every answer came from. Your consultants check the work and sign it.
Each client’s manual against its own rules
Upload a client’s manual and Chuck sets the wording against the requirement row by row and proposes where it has drifted, in a spreadsheet your consultant works through. It names the governing framework on every line, and won’t apply an FAA rule to an EASA operation or the other way round.
- Gap analysis against FAA, EASA and UK CAA rules, exported to Excel
- A procedure on paper with no evidence it runs, kept apart from one that conforms
- Audit findings, compliance memos and manual sections drafted to Word or a branded PDF
- A shared project for each audit, holding its documents and chats
Working with us as a partner
Consulting firms are among the development partners we’re looking for. A partner firm works closely with our team while Chuck is built, and has a say in what it does next.
- Early access to new features
- Preferential terms
- A say in what we build next
What consultancies can put in place
- An occurrence worked through with you, its coding and reportability proposed
- A year of your occurrence reports read as a set, with themes, counts and direction
- Your own manuals read beside the regulations
- Your wording set against a requirement row by row, exported to Excel
- Documents drafted to Word or a branded PDF
- Answers from the rule text, cited to the provision and, where the source publishes one, the amendment
- A shared project for each audit or investigation, holding its documents and chats
Common questions
Which rules does it answer from?
FAA, EASA and UK CAA. It names the governing framework on every line, and won’t apply an FAA rule to an EASA operation or the other way round. If the rules don’t cover your question, it says so.
Can it check a client’s manual against the rules?
Yes. It sets the manual against the requirement row by row and proposes where the wording has drifted, in a spreadsheet your consultant can work through. Where a procedure is written down but nothing shows it runs, it says so as its own finding rather than marking it compliant. It cites each rule’s amendment where the source publishes one, and redrafts a section when you ask.
What can it draft?
Audit findings, compliance memos, gap analyses, manual sections, procedures and risk assessments among others, to Word or a branded PDF. Every draft says it was AI-generated, tells the reader to check it before use, and has a blank sign-off for whoever checks it.
Does our data train AI models?
No. Your questions, documents and answers are never used as training data, and that’s written into our contract. Our model provider keeps nothing after each request, and the documents you upload are held on our own UK infrastructure, scoped to your organisation.
Can our firm become a development partner?
Yes. Consulting firms are among the partners we’re looking for: early access to new features, preferential terms and a say in what we build next. Register on our development partners page and we’ll arrange a call.
Related

Tell us how your firm works
Bring a manual section you’re reviewing for a client, and we’ll run it through Chuck in front of you. If your firm would like a say in what it does next, join the development partners.
All solutions