AI for MRO safety and compliance teams
Chuck proposes which of your aircraft a directive applies to, and reads your MOE and CAME against the regulations.
Sample data. Wexmoor Technics is a fictional maintenance organisation. The app’s own workflow: “Airworthiness Directive applicability / compliance memo”.
One directive, a row per aircraft.
Directive applicability worked a row per aircraft, cited to the directive and the Part, and proposed for your continuing airworthiness team to confirm.
In airworthiness, an answer you can’t trace is no use. Chuck works across Part-CAMO, Part-M, Part-145 and Part-21, cross-referenced to the FAA equivalents, and ties every answer to the Part it came from and, where the source publishes one, the revision.
Directives across the fleet.
A directive campaign across a fleet is a row per aircraft. Chuck proposes applicability for each one with its basis, says why any aircraft falls outside the effectivity, and exports the table to Excel for the rest of the department.
- Airworthiness Directive and service bulletin applicability
- EU 1321/2014 Part-CAMO, Part-M and Part-145, and Part-21 under EU 748/2012
- Cross-referenced to FAA 14 CFR Parts 43, 91 and 145 and the UK equivalents
What maintenance organisations can put in place.
- An occurrence worked through with you, its coding and reportability proposed
- A year of your occurrence reports read as a set, with themes, counts and direction
- Your own manuals read beside the regulations
- Your wording set against a requirement row by row, exported to Excel
- Documents drafted to Word or PDF
- Answers from the regulation text, cited to the provision and, where the source publishes one, the amendment
- A shared project for each audit or investigation, holding its documents and chats
Common questions
Can Chuck work an airworthiness directive across our fleet?
Yes, a row per aircraft, with proposed applicability and its basis for your team to confirm. Aircraft outside the effectivity are flagged with the reason, and the table exports to Excel.
Which airworthiness regulations does the AI cover?
EU 1321/2014 (Part-CAMO, Part-M and Part-145) and Part-21 under EU 748/2012. They’re cross-referenced to FAA 14 CFR Parts 43, 91 and 145 and the UK equivalents.
Can it check our exposition against Part-145?
Yes. It sets your MOE against the Part row by row and proposes the gaps for you to check. Where a section needs rewriting, it drafts it with the requirement cited beside each clause.
Can it draft a maintenance programme section?
Yes, to Word or a branded PDF, with the governing requirement cited and a check-before-use line and a sign-off at the top.
Does our data train AI models?
No. Your questions, documents and answers are never used as training data, and that’s written into our contract. Our model provider keeps nothing after each request, and the documents you upload are held on our own UK infrastructure, scoped to your organisation.
Tell us how you operate.
Bring a manual section you think has drifted, or a year of reports nobody has read as a set, and we’ll run it through Chuck in front of you. We’ll tell you straight if we’re not the right people for it.