Department
Aviation AI for Airworthiness & CAMO
Continuing-airworthiness obligations, directive applicability and the maintenance-programme text that follows from them — traceable to the governing Part and revision.
In short
Worked example
Directive notice · fleet list, 6 aircraft
Illustrative example
Work this airworthiness directive across the fleet. One row per aircraft: is it applicable, by when, and by what method. Flag anything outside the effectivity.
- Four of six aircraft are inside the effectivity. Three comply by inspection per the AMM task; one requires replacement per the service bulletin before further flight.
- Two aircraft carry pre-modification serials outside the effectivity — flagged with the reason, not silently dropped from the grid.
- The grid is worked, not written: each row holds its applicability, compliance date and method, and the set exports to XLSX as it stands.
Registrations and effectivity are invented for the page; the column set is the product's own review grid.
Directives and service bulletins
Applicability worked through against the governing Part, with the compliance method and date, and the whole set worked as a review grid where a fleet campaign needs a row per aircraft. Every answer ties back to the Part and revision it came from.
- Airworthiness Directive applicability and compliance memo
- AD/SB applicability review, worked as a review grid
The maintenance programme and the review certificate
Maintenance-programme approval, component and life-limited-part control, and the airworthiness review certificate — answered against Part-CAMO and Part-M, then drafted as the programme section that satisfies them.
- Continuing-airworthiness obligation lookup
- Draft a maintenance-programme section
The CAMO and Part-145 interface
The scope questions that sit between the continuing-airworthiness organisation and the maintenance organisation — where the responsibility sits, what the approval actually covers, and how the equivalent requirement reads under the FAA. This is the seam most audits find, and it is where a cited answer earns its keep.
- Part-145 and Part-CAO scope questions
Included
What every seat carries
- Grounded mode — every regulatory claim cited to the passage behind it
- Cite or refuse — no answer where the corpus does not support one
- Amendment-aware citations, dated to the revision they belong to
- FAA, EASA, UK CAA and 2-REG frameworks, to your organisation's entitlement
- Your own manuals and exposition, read alongside the regulation corpus
- Drafting to DOCX or branded PDF from nine aviation templates
- Review grids worked row by row, exported to XLSX
- Dictation, transcribed on our own UK infrastructure
- Memory across chats, so context is not retyped every session
- Projects grouping the documents, chats and reviews for one piece of work
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Next
Put it against your own maintenance programme
CitadelAI is licensed per seat, from three seats, and set up by our team with the frameworks your organisation operates under. Every department works in the same platform — the seat is the licence, not the department.