Skip to main content
CitadelAero

Department

Aviation AI for Flight Operations

Flight time limitations, the operations manual, the MEL and performance — answered against the framework your operation actually runs under, then written up as the procedure that implements it.

In short

Flight operations questions are rarely about what the rule says in the abstract. They are about what it says for this operation type, under this framework, in this revision. Chuck works in Flight Ops mode across EU 965/2012 — Part-ORO, Part-CAT for commercial air transport, and Part-NCC, Part-NCO and Part-SPO for non-commercial and specialised operations — with FAA 14 CFR Parts 91, 121 and 135 and the UK equivalents where an operator crosses frameworks. Every regulatory answer is tied to the operation type and the governing framework, and cited to the provision it came from.

Worked example

Regulation corpus — EASA

Illustrative example

You

We're a Part-NCC operator taking on a second base. Do we need a fatigue risk management system, or is that only for commercial air transport?

  • Part-ORO states its own scope, and it reaches non-commercial operations with complex motor-powered aircraft — so the management-system requirements are yours.ORO.GEN.005
  • Subpart FTL states a narrower scope: aircrew assigned to commercial air transport with aeroplanes. It does not bind your operation.ORO.FTL.100
  • That management system has to identify hazards, evaluate them and manage the associated risks. Fatigue is one of those hazards.ORO.GEN.200(a)(3)

Every claim traces to a cited provision, with its amendment state. Illustrative only; not regulatory advice.

Flight time limitations, settled against the rule

Subpart FTL questions get an answer built from the provision rather than from a table someone typed out three revisions ago — with the citation, its legal weight, and the amendment state, so you know which version you are reading before you roster against it.

  • Flight time limitations and rest requirements
  • The operation type that governs — CAT, NCC, NCO or SPO
  • Cross-framework comparison where you hold more than one approval

From the answer to the manual section

The same session that settles the requirement drafts the text that satisfies it. Operations Manual sections and standard operating procedures are produced through the drafting tools and exported as DOCX, with the governing requirement cited beside the clause so a reviewer can see the basis for every line.

  • Draft an Operations Manual section
  • Draft an SOP or operational procedure
  • Dispatch under an inoperative item — the MEL question, with its provision

Aircraft performance and operating limitations

Performance and operating-limitation requirements traced to the rule text, and compared across frameworks where the same aircraft is operated under more than one. Where the corpus does not cover a point, Chuck says so and suggests where to verify rather than producing a plausible number.

Included

What every seat carries

  • Grounded mode — every regulatory claim cited to the passage behind it
  • Cite or refuse — no answer where the corpus does not support one
  • Amendment-aware citations, dated to the revision they belong to
  • FAA, EASA, UK CAA and 2-REG frameworks, to your organisation's entitlement
  • Your own manuals and exposition, read alongside the regulation corpus
  • Drafting to DOCX or branded PDF from nine aviation templates
  • Review grids worked row by row, exported to XLSX
  • Dictation, transcribed on our own UK infrastructure
  • Memory across chats, so context is not retyped every session
  • Projects grouping the documents, chats and reviews for one piece of work

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Next

Put it against your own Operations Manual

CitadelAI is licensed per seat, from three seats, and set up by our team with the frameworks your organisation operates under. Every department works in the same platform — the seat is the licence, not the department.