Department
Aviation AI for Flight Operations
Flight time limitations, the operations manual, the MEL and performance — answered against the framework your operation actually runs under, then written up as the procedure that implements it.
In short
Worked example
Regulation corpus — EASA
Illustrative example
We're a Part-NCC operator taking on a second base. Do we need a fatigue risk management system, or is that only for commercial air transport?
- Part-ORO states its own scope, and it reaches non-commercial operations with complex motor-powered aircraft — so the management-system requirements are yours.ORO.GEN.005
- Subpart FTL states a narrower scope: aircrew assigned to commercial air transport with aeroplanes. It does not bind your operation.ORO.FTL.100
- That management system has to identify hazards, evaluate them and manage the associated risks. Fatigue is one of those hazards.ORO.GEN.200(a)(3)
Every claim traces to a cited provision, with its amendment state. Illustrative only; not regulatory advice.
Flight time limitations, settled against the rule
Subpart FTL questions get an answer built from the provision rather than from a table someone typed out three revisions ago — with the citation, its legal weight, and the amendment state, so you know which version you are reading before you roster against it.
- Flight time limitations and rest requirements
- The operation type that governs — CAT, NCC, NCO or SPO
- Cross-framework comparison where you hold more than one approval
From the answer to the manual section
The same session that settles the requirement drafts the text that satisfies it. Operations Manual sections and standard operating procedures are produced through the drafting tools and exported as DOCX, with the governing requirement cited beside the clause so a reviewer can see the basis for every line.
- Draft an Operations Manual section
- Draft an SOP or operational procedure
- Dispatch under an inoperative item — the MEL question, with its provision
Aircraft performance and operating limitations
Performance and operating-limitation requirements traced to the rule text, and compared across frameworks where the same aircraft is operated under more than one. Where the corpus does not cover a point, Chuck says so and suggests where to verify rather than producing a plausible number.
Included
What every seat carries
- Grounded mode — every regulatory claim cited to the passage behind it
- Cite or refuse — no answer where the corpus does not support one
- Amendment-aware citations, dated to the revision they belong to
- FAA, EASA, UK CAA and 2-REG frameworks, to your organisation's entitlement
- Your own manuals and exposition, read alongside the regulation corpus
- Drafting to DOCX or branded PDF from nine aviation templates
- Review grids worked row by row, exported to XLSX
- Dictation, transcribed on our own UK infrastructure
- Memory across chats, so context is not retyped every session
- Projects grouping the documents, chats and reviews for one piece of work
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Next
Put it against your own Operations Manual
CitadelAI is licensed per seat, from three seats, and set up by our team with the frameworks your organisation operates under. Every department works in the same platform — the seat is the licence, not the department.