Department
Aviation AI for Safety & SMS
From the occurrence landing in the inbox to the safety case that closes it out — reportability decided against the provision, and the report drafted in the same pass.
In short
Worked example
Regulation corpus — EASA
Illustrative example
We're rewriting our just-culture statement. What does the Regulation actually protect, and where does our management system have to carry it?
- Where disciplinary or administrative proceedings are brought under national law, information in an occurrence report is not used against the reporter or a person mentioned in it, save in the cases the Regulation excepts.Reg (EU) 376/2014, Art. 16(7)
- The safety policy is a management-system component in its own right, describing the operator's philosophies and principles with regard to safety.ORO.GEN.200(a)(2)
- An accountable manager is appointed with the authority to ensure activities are financed and carried out to the applicable requirements, and nominated persons are made responsible for continued compliance.ORO.GEN.210
The same session drafts the statement, with the governing provision cited beside each commitment. Illustrative only; not regulatory advice.
Reportability, decided against the provision
Whether an occurrence is reportable, under which provision, to which authority and inside what deadline — with the rule text that decides it shown beside the answer. The same workflow then drafts the report, so the decision and the document are not two separate pieces of work.
- Is this occurrence reportable? — and draft the report
- Mandatory and voluntary reporting under EU 376/2014
- The FAA and UK reporting regimes where you span frameworks
Hazard identification and risk assessment
Build a 5×5 risk assessment for a hazard, work an investigation through to a safety case, and keep the regulatory basis attached to each step. Risk is assessed proportionately and grounded in the applicable rule rather than in a house convention that has drifted from it.
- Build a 5×5 risk assessment for a hazard
- Draft a safety case
- Summarise an incident investigation report
- Occurrence report triage, worked as a review grid
The system behind the reports
The management-system requirements themselves — safety policy, safety performance indicators, the safety review board and safety action groups, and a just-culture framework — drafted and checked against ORO.GEN and the equivalent provisions in the frameworks you operate under.
- Draft an SMS procedure
- Draft a safety policy or just-culture statement
Included
What every seat carries
- Grounded mode — every regulatory claim cited to the passage behind it
- Cite or refuse — no answer where the corpus does not support one
- Amendment-aware citations, dated to the revision they belong to
- FAA, EASA, UK CAA and 2-REG frameworks, to your organisation's entitlement
- Your own manuals and exposition, read alongside the regulation corpus
- Drafting to DOCX or branded PDF from nine aviation templates
- Review grids worked row by row, exported to XLSX
- Dictation, transcribed on our own UK infrastructure
- Memory across chats, so context is not retyped every session
- Projects grouping the documents, chats and reviews for one piece of work
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Next
Put it against your own occurrence reports
CitadelAI is licensed per seat, from three seats, and set up by our team with the frameworks your organisation operates under. Every department works in the same platform — the seat is the licence, not the department.